Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Classic anti-Semitism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Mo0[talk] 07:49, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Classic_anti-Semitism

This article seems to have been created for the sole purpose of creating a "counter" to the New anti-Semitism article. It consists entirely of OR (such as the false claim that 'Classic anti-Semitism refers to the the political right's attempts to ..." as well as "Examples" which are irrelevant to "Classical anti-Semitism Isarig 03:56, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete Anti-semitism is a very much overblown topic that frankly, just isn't worth discussing anymore. --TrevorMay 04:04, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete What's next? Neo-classic anti-Semitism? Fails WP:NOR. Ted 04:14, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete I'm Jewish, but this page seems un-necessary as the only purpose is to create a "counter article" for New anti-Semitism. --Danielrocks123 04:29, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - what the? "Classic anti-Semitism refers to the the political right's attempts to use the Jewish people, as a collective, as a token symbol while advancing an anti-Semitic agenda." No, that's not POV-pushing or anything ... BigDT 05:15, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete One of a number of recent pov forks clearly in violation of WP:Point.- Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg | Talk 05:48, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Original researh and violation of WP:POINT. Pecher Talk 06:57, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, absolutely fails WP:NPOV. A NPOV article probably could be written on the subject, but this sure ain't it. --Coredesat 07:32, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete neologism and original research. --MPerel ( talk | contrib) 08:16, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete seems to fail both WP:NOR and WP:NPOV. Kevin 09:35, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Kevin puts it nicely. --Leifern 12:25, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Until scholars start making this diistinction, it's OR. Ace of Sevens 12:38, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Strongly POV, and while I don't doubt that some on the far right have made and still make the false analogy that Communism/liberalism was the same as Judaism Communism=liberalism=Judiasm (it was the stock in trade for Father Coughlin and Sen. Martin Dies in the '50s), it seems to be much more an apologia for the left as it was in the early '50s attempt to discredit conservative positions by the invoking of Godwin's Law than any serious discussion of anti-Semitism. Pat Payne 19:46, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. POV fork. SlimVirgin (talk) 22:45, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per SlimVirgin. —Khoikhoi 04:50, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete and delete the counterpart too. CalJW 05:29, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete both. The other is a farrago of POV too. We have to take more care not to confuse "someone uses term x to mean <body of article>" with "term x is <body of article>". Grace Note 00:34, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Original research, utterly fails to be written in a Neutral Point of View and zero references.--Auger Martel 10:54, 17 June 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.