Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clan fate

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was SPEEDY DELETE. Harro5 00:41, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Clan fate

Another gaming clan, same reasons as above (ESkog)^(Talk) 03:01, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete Josh Parris#: 04:15, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Isn't this a speedy delete? Madman 06:08, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment - It is my understanding that the nn-bio criterion only applies for biographies of individual people. It'd be tough to justify expanding that because established groups may have more presumption of notability. We even have a few gaming clans which have survived AFDs... (ESkog)^(Talk) 08:48, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment: non-notable groups cannot be speedily deleted, yet. Which gaming clans survived AfD? -- Kjkolb 12:32, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
    • Sturmgrenadier survived a VfD, but only for lack of consensus. You can call me Al 19:21, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Same reasons as Clan Toru. - Mgm|^(talk) 09:52, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Clancruft. You can call me Al 19:22, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as per new wikipolicy nn-club Zzzzz 20:23, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.