Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claire McCarthy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[edit] Claire McCarthy

The result was Speedy Delete as nonsense (without comment on previous admin's decision). AnonEMouse ^(squeak) 17:41, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Claire McCarthy (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

A kiddie prank article, no monarchs in Bohemia until 910, and they didn't have Scottish names like "McCarthy"... Again, an admin declined to speedy this obvious nonsense. Tubezone 06:04, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy delete per nom. MER-C 06:13, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Good catch. WP:NONSENSE defines "patent nonsense" pretty strictly.--Kchase T 06:58, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

This should have been speedied as vandalism, anyway... First line of WP:VANDAL:Vandalism is any addition, deletion, or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia, which pretty much describes what this article is. Tubezone 07:14, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 08:51, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
• Comment This daft article was happily sitting in its rightful place - the Proposed Deletion queue - with no further interference from the original author. Why did it need to go through AfD? 193.60.222.2 10:16, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete garbage. Danny Lilithborne 12:39, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
• Speedly Delete garbage. Who decided not to? What a waste of time to have read it to check.KP Botany 16:33, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.