Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/City destroying lasers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 00:14, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] City destroying lasers

City destroying lasers (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Unencyclopaedic. Couldn't decide on a speedy category though. Chris (talk) 22:12, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete as unverifiable information about a possibly non-notable topic -- although to steal a line from Dave Barry, it would be a good name for a rock band. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 22:20, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete as totally unreferenced, largely conjecture. Could have been speedied as lacking context in all honesty. -- Roleplayer (talk) 22:26, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete makey-uppy nonsense. Camillus (talk) 22:39, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete cruft. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 22:52, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. BanRay 23:40, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
• Weak Delete: Interesting concept. Since it doesn't list a single novel/movie/comic/whatever that uses this tool, nor any sources, it looks like OR.jonathon (talk) 00:05, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete: I think I played a computer game based on this concept. Anyway, probably best as a one-liner written into Plot device. Somebody snowball this. --Auto ^{(talk / contribs)} 01:19, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

• Plot device or doomsday weapon are possible targets. I think snowball is in order. --Agamemnon2 (talk) 08:03, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.