Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Michael Chapman
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Owen× ☎ 18:05, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Christopher Michael Chapman
vanity article; not noteworthy; self-promotion StanZegel (talk) 00:52, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. PJM 03:34, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete oer nom. Herostratus 07:45, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. This one is obvious...Banes 09:06, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy delete, or delete if that isn't possible. Stifle 15:53, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy delete A7. If this isn't an nn-bio, what would be? — Haeleth Talk 16:47, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --StuffOfInterest 19:37, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as A7. Turnstep 21:26, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete and tagged for speedy. The Management would like it known that we are not in any way related. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 00:15, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
-
- Comment Saw this while looking through speedy tags. I suppose his claim to fame would be designing these collectible pins. That's just enough for me to consider it an assertion of notability, and therefore should be evaluated through the normal AFD process. Somewhat silly given that it's obvious this article is going to be deleted, but there you have it. I'm removing the speedy tag to let the AFD run its course. · Katefan0(scribble) 05:32, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
- OK, I have no problem with that. As you say, it's on the borderline. - Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 09:20, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
- Comment Saw this while looking through speedy tags. I suppose his claim to fame would be designing these collectible pins. That's just enough for me to consider it an assertion of notability, and therefore should be evaluated through the normal AFD process. Somewhat silly given that it's obvious this article is going to be deleted, but there you have it. I'm removing the speedy tag to let the AFD run its course. · Katefan0(scribble) 05:32, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete not notable, vanity. MONGO 01:50, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
- DELETE - fluff Williamb 00:43, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
