Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian Music Central

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:15, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Christian Music Central

Christian Music Central (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

non notable christian music site. Could be speedied, as it makes no assertion of notability. ⇒ SWATJester On Belay! 14:45, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

  • Speedy Delete This is blatant commercial advertising and should be deleted. Greatestrowerever 15:04, 23 March 2007 (GMT)
  • Delete per WP:Spam. -Sucrine ( ><> talk) 15:23, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete; violates WP:SPAM --Mhking 15:56, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete: fails WP:WEB, probably WP:SPAM, definitely WP:ATT. RGTraynor 16:02, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment without voting For full disclosure, I started this article. I am NOT IN ANY WAY associated with this website and I am NOT A SPAMMER. I was the second member of WikiProject Contemporary Christian Music. I was trying to write articles for what I believe are some of the common references for the WikiProject.
See below I have started a discussion on the WikiProject's talk page to encourage WikiProject discussion on this topic. Please do not speedy delete to allow for participants of the WikiProject to comment. Royalbroil T : C 18:27, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
  • I suggest Delete - not as spam, but simply as non-notable. The Alexa ranking and google information I'm not sure would be reliable for the purpose - those are side notes. I'm just not seeing anything reliable for notability that can be verified. --Dennisthe2 22:54, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Do not speedy. Although it may fall under WP:CSD#A7, please respect Royalbroil's request for time to possibly fix that. Assume good faith that this user will make an effort to come up with something. If it does get deleted, it can wait five days. As to the actual keeping or deletion, I abstain. — coelacan — 04:42, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
  • I marked for speedy delete as author. I ask an admin to speedy delete the article and close this AfD. A lack of interest from WikiProject lead me to believe that I probably created an article that isn't needed. I probably gave greater weight to the importance of the website than it deserves. It is short and can easily be restored later if the WikiProject decides to restore it. I'll take a mulligan on this one. Please consider that this is the poorest article that I have ever created. It took me over an hour of searching to find this little. It is difficult to find reliable sources for any Christian website. I won't back down on the Jesus Freak Hideout AfD, as I am certain that reliable reference needs to remain. Royalbroil T : C 23:55, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.