Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Coletti
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sr13 01:59, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Chris Coletti
Non-notable subject - no google hits support this article. There has been no response to a request for references, nor any attempt to address the issue in any way. This article appears to a disquised spam article promoting http://www.yourfaithtoday.com/ . Evb-wiki 18:17, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom --Whsitchy 18:22, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete as spam. DarkAudit 18:43, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as non-notable bio. Spam sentence has already been removed, so speedy not applicable. AKRadecki 19:55, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- Still looks like spam to me. DarkAudit 19:59, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- That's possibly true, but it's also a bio that asserts notability, so is disqualified from CSD AKRadecki 20:11, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- Only so far as a bio speedy is concerned. Notability and spam are completely separate speedy categories. DarkAudit 20:20, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- yeah. Of course, I had orig. tagged speedy as nonsense. Running for Pres. 2012? sure. --Evb-wiki 20:23, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- That's possibly true, but it's also a bio that asserts notability, so is disqualified from CSD AKRadecki 20:11, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- Still looks like spam to me. DarkAudit 19:59, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Someone's favorite youth minister; nonnotable. NawlinWiki 20:33, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
If I can chime in (not sure that this is the right place for it). Chris Coletti and his work are rapidly gaining followers and fans among LCMS church and the national LCMS office in St. Louis. He has proven himself for many years to be among the most innovative and unrelenting LCMS workers of our time,Citation needed. there is no doubt about that. If the mention of the website is the problem, I would suggest taking that portion off. But without a doubt the entire entry shouldn't be removed. His contribution within LCMS circles and his growing fame among Christianity warrants the mention on him. Thanks for your time.
I just noticed one thing in the discussion...........he does plan on running for President in 2012.Citation needed. He understands that it's too late for the 2008 campaign, but sees the 2012 as a realistic opportunity to have his ideas reach a larger audience.....I think he understands that he wouldn't win the election, but hopes to pull in 2 - 4% of the vote and thus get the discuss of the issues going in a direction he feels they should go. So that part is legitimate.
-
- The added links do not support the factual claims made in the article nor do they establish the subjects notability. --Evb-wiki 03:56, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I cannot see how anyone could make a usable stub of the material here, and I would have said speedy as spam--there isn't even any basic biography. If he becomes more notable and people actually publish something informative, then we might be able to have an article. DGG 07:12, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
- Comment The article has actually become more spammy during the course of the discussion. DarkAudit 16:15, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
