Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chocolate skunk
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Denelson83 08:43, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Chocolate skunk
Nonsensical neologism, just barely above CSD Ashibaka (tock) 00:21, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Practically patent nonsense. Turnstep 01:54, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Quite a stinky neo, isn't it. PJM 02:08, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
- I think it could have been speedied, so Delete, sans doute. --DavidConrad 05:43, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
Delete - someone told me on the village pump that nonsense articles can be speedy deleted by administrators. If that's true, can't an administrator simply delete this one? Pintele Yid 06:26, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete It's not patent nonsense, but it is a neologism--I couldn't find any evidence the term is actually used this way, except for one reference. Demi T/C 07:19, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete dic def. Can you share the reference you found. All I found was related to modelled chocolate. Yummy! - Mgm|(talk) 11:51, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per nom., dicdef. - Dalbury (talk) 12:31, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete nonsense. Ze miguel 13:08, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete neologism with no evidence of significant currency Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] :: AfD? 14:04, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Terrible. 10:52, 10 November 2005 (EST)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

