Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheggit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Keep. Deathphoenix ʕ 17:37, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cheggit

There's no indication that this website meets any of the criteria of WP:WEB. In particular, there are no links (as are required) showing that it is "the subject of multiple non-trivial published works", and none are readily apparent from Google. Wikipedia is not a directory of websites. This appears to be just an advertisement for an nn-website.

• Delete per nom. Zzzzz 18:16, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. It has not yet been launched. Let it be launched, let it grow, then see if it meets WP:WEB. Right now it does not. -Seidenstud 19:41, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. This could just be another vapor site that is all hype. Let it exist first, then write about it. Once created, it must be notable in it's own right. Simply being competition of Emponium is not enough. HighInBC 20:12, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

qq more gimps. how is this effecting you having this page on the website? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.200.164.131 (talk • contribs)

• Keep as a breakoff from the largest porntracker there is, and quite interesting story about why it is breaking away from empornium. even more interesting than the piratebay case if you ask me ;) this article got prospects of being very interesting —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ookah (talk • contribs)

user's first and only edit Zzzzz 00:21, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

comment A potential breakoff, it is just a pageholder now. HighInBC 21:34, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. Even thought it could look like a blatant ad for the new website from the Empornium creators, who lost Empornium to a corporate takeover, it should be kept because it IS the new website from the ex-Empornium founders and so the continuity of this story Johnnyg0 7 July 2006 (UTC) (the previous comment was posted by 66.36.141.82. HumbleGod 23:31, 7 July 2006 (UTC))

anon user's second edit (both AFD votes) Zzzzz 00:21, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as crystal-balling WP:WEB fail. --DaveG12345 03:52, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep qwm 19:38, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep its a crucial part of the fall of empornium. at the worst, this article could be merged with the main empornium article. Carterhawk
• Merge and Redirect. Changed my vote from Keep or Merge to this, because it doesn't meet WP:WEB yet, but it is a significant part of the Empornium article. As much as its users want to distance from Empornium, Cheggit is still not yet important, Wikipedia-wise, on its own. TransUtopian 21:20, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. As per nomination. Catherine breillat 23:58, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Carterhawk —Preceding unsigned comment added by DemonKyoto (talk • contribs)
• Keep or at least Merge This will become a major community later on so let it grow... from the Citybug —Preceding unsigned comment added by Citybug (talk • contribs)
• Keep : for now, the interesting thing is not the page itself, but the community (more than 600.000 people worldwilde) movement, and the commercial putsch against Empornium.

user has less than 20 edits Zzzzz 01:02, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.