Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaylon Brewster

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete ~ trialsanderrors 02:38, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Chaylon Brewster

Chaylon Brewster (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Article fails to establish notability, and vast majority of google search results are copies of this article from various sources rernst 10:55, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 17:02, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

• Oops - rernst 23:26, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
• And if this page is deleted, someone might do well to remove the redirect Nevski as well.

• Delete, created by single-purpose account, probable WP:COI self-promotion. No evidence of notability. --Dhartung | Talk 17:43, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete non notable per nom.--John Lake 17:51, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Seems to fail WP:MUSIC. —ShadowHalo 19:47, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
• So what needs to be done to save this article? This is not sell promotion, adding it for artist from my home town that won an ECMA award. john2005crab

• The truth is, very little. As the three points above outline, and my own point, detail why the article should not be kept. There is a certain level of notability required for inclusion on Wikipedia. For music-related entries, see WP:MUSIC -- Mr Brewster seems to not meet any of those requirements. Perhaps he may at some point, but wikipedia is not a crystal ball either. If it is deleted and Mr. Brewster qualifies in the future, the page can be recreated. Neither is it necessary to create substub-level articles on every alias of every single hip-hop artist. I hope this clarifies your concerns - rernst 18:23, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
• So what kind of notability needs to be added? He has been on Much Music, won an ECMA (East Coast Music Award), etc? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.222.210.2 (talk) 18:13, 18 December 2006 (UTC).

• There are now at least three links in this discussion to the wikipedia page that outlines music-related notability requirements. The article must *at least* meet one of those (the more the better), must be verifiable (citations are nice). A lot of people seem to think that this article is self-promotion. Such things are usually dealt with harshly. Also, contributions from logged-in users are usually given consideration over anonymous IPs. - rernst 19:45, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.