The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was speedy keep. — FireFox • T • 20:13, 26 January 2006
I believe this article is nonsense, and complete rubbish. We don't even have an article for Anthony Hutton so why have one on her? Chias 19:12, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
The solution is to write one on Anthony Hutton. This is the 3rd nomination in two weeks, and User:Chias's first ever edit. Speedy Keep for now, revisit in 6 months.-- GWO
Speedy keep; Yeah, being on BB is notable enough for inclusion. --Andy Saunders 19:28, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
Speedy keep as per the last two nominations. -Sweetie Petie 19:59, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.