Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chanchati

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 03:12, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Chanchati

Chanchati (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Not notable, orphaned, irrelevant. can you say moo? Ⓐ 00:01, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Delete per nom. Not to mention there's almost no content in it. —Signed by KoЯnfan71 ^{My Talk} _{Sign Here!} 00:07, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Keep Regardless of how much info is currently in the article, general consensus is that villages are allowed per WP:OUTCOMES. And to be fair, the article does state that it is a stub. A^RendedWinter 00:18, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy keep All villages and cities includable well-established consensus--Victor falk 01:26, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - Towns and villages are notable regardless of size. --Oakshade 01:35, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
• Keep One of the only (maybe the only) always notable categories is settled places (towns and villages). --Jayron32|talk|contribs 05:46, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

I thought it was the only one. What might the others be?--Victor falk 06:50, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

I can't think of any other one as general as this. There are a few other minor exceptions to the Primary Notability Criterion (for example, an otherwise non-notable company becomes instantly notable if it appears in the Fortune 500 or is used in the S&P 500 or something like that, even if the article has no other sources to expand it past a stub), but other than the settled places exception, those are few and not often needed, as most of the exceptions are otherwise notable ANYWAYS.--Jayron32|talk|contribs 16:25, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

• Keep for reasons already listed. However it certainly could use some help with more content. Tiggerjay 07:41, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - A real town/village, hence automatically notable. Nothing wrong with stubs, that's why we have stub markers. Ben W Bell talk 11:24, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Keep Article lacks content, but towns are,by definition, notable.jonathon 08:16, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.