Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cathrine Ferner Johansen

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect all. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 10:36, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cathrine Ferner Johansen, Madeleine Ferner Johansen, Sebastian Ferner Johansen

subject is approx 76th in line to the British throne and also distant pretender to the Norwegian throne. I also nominate for deletion the pages of her children Madeleine Ferner Johansen, Sebastian Ferner Johansen. No apparent notability outside their distant claims to the throne(s). Ohconfucius 03:25, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

  • Very Weak Delete — Almost no hits in search engines, but if anyone can show an ounce of notability I'm opening to changing my vote mboverload@ 04:10, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete tangential royalty is not notable in and of itself. Delete the kids too. Wait, that sounds kind of sinister. Opabinia regalis 04:25, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete All See comment on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ulf Bauscher — NMChico24 04:45, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete I keep having to stop myself writing Off with their heads Dlyons493 Talk 11:21, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete all, so what if they are in the line of succession to the British throne, they are mainly non-notable people. --Terence Ong (Chat | Contribs) 12:53, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Enough already! Perhaps this should have been done as one big AfD. Maybe leave a redirect behind ot the line of succession article but even that doesn't seem worth the effort. StuffOfInterest 13:57, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep -- I would Redirect to Line of succession to the British Throne everybody under #100 in line with no independent claim of notability. NawlinWiki 14:06, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Line of succession to the British Throne. 76th in line is no claim to notability. But redirect wouldn't hurt. - Aksi_great (talk - review me) 14:51, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirect per Aksi_great. The figures have no other claims of notability, and redirects are cheap. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 21:59, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirect but to Princess Astrid of Norway, their links to the Norwegian throne is closer then to the British. --Eivindt@c 22:19, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Princess Astrid of Norway, nearest notable family member is where they belong. Content will need to be merged in (ie, a whole line). LinaMishima 23:28, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep as per other articles nominated by same user -- Roleplayer 02:43, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete nn Matthew Fenton (Talk | Contribs) 11:07, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep- Astrotrain 12:31, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as previous, if 39th is far as Brenda's website goes (here) why should we go further ? WP:NOT a genealogy database or Burke's Peerage. Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:31, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per my comments on the earlier batches of pseudo-distant-royal-ish-folks. Carlossuarez46 06:26, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep verifiable grandchildren of monarchs (this seems reasonable, right?); merge the children into Cathrine's article. Ardric47 22:45, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment—Perhaps some people "voted" based on their position in the British line of succession. That information is overshadowed by their relations to the Norwegian royal family. Ardric47 22:45, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Cathy; Delete Maddy and Seb - Cathy is close enough to the Norwegian throne. Theothers are not. BlueValour 04:19, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirect per Aski. Nickieee 07:28, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirect per LinaMishima. --Angelbo 04:38, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.