Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cathleen Vitale

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:47, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Cathleen Vitale

Cathleen Vitale (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

County council members and rumored candidates for higher office do not meet notability criteria in WP:BIO - Mocko13 18:20, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Even a winner of the office would have questionable notability. --Dhartung | Talk 18:38, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - Lacks notability and sources. Luis₁₉₇₂ (Talk • My Contribs) 18:42, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Seems like she would flunk WP:BIO, even if sourced. youngamerican (ahoy hoy) 21:05, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete minor apparatchik. Wikipedia is not a repository of junior politicians' resumés. Ohconfucius 06:26, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Tip to nominator: Consider using the proposed deletion process for uncontroversial deletions, such as this one. Thanks! -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:48, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.