Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carol Bambery (2 nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. — Scientizzle 01:06, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Carol Bambery (2ND NOM)

Carol Bambery (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Second AfD. First one was anemic. Still no references, still not enough notability, still going nowhere. -- Y not? 00:27, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Last AFD's keeps were entirely over her work with the NRA. WP:BIO says she personally needs to be the subject of secondary sources that are reliable. THe only sourced coverage is trivial.--Dacium 00:46, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Fopkins | Talk 01:11, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - per Dacium. The sources I am looking at are surface and unreliable. Without references, this should go. the_undertow ^talk 01:33, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:BIO, unreliable sources. Sr13 (T|C) 03:01, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete One would think there would be some notability for the staff counsel of a lobbying group. So, if it's not here she's sure not notable. JodyB 03:37, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:BIOShindo9Hikaru 22:48, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Arbustoo 21:32, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.