Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carnegie libraries image gallery

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, but transwiki to Commons first. --Ezeu 18:26, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Carnegie libraries image gallery

Wikipedia is not Commons Zgo!! 10:02, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete or transwiki to Commons. Best suited to over there. MER-C 12:25, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, KrakatoaKatie 07:19, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: I'm hesitant about deleting the gallery and the images because many of those libraries are on the National Register of Historic Places. On the other hand, an image gallery doesn't provide much information about those libraries. Would it be more appropriate to put these images into a category? --Elkman - (Elkspeak) 18:35, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per above.--Kf4bdy talk contribs 18:16, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete if some of the more interesting images are added to Carnegie library. JYolkowski // talk 21:09, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete but make sure to move all the images to commons first. Borisblue 16:06, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: I'm not sure the images are suitable for Commons. According to commons:Commons:Licensing#Material in the public domain, you'd have to know the author died more than 70 years ago. We don't know the dates of these or the authors or anything. —Wknight94 (talk) 04:43, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.