Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camelot (drinking game)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 06:15, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Camelot (drinking game)

Camelot (drinking game) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

{Prod} contested ("...It won't take long for it to spread to other colleges. ...it wouldn't be right to deny the rest of the USA from finding out about it." from Talk:Camelot (drinking game)), so here we are...Two-month old, local drinking game is not notable--also problems with WP:OR and WP:VERIFY (MySpace and FaceBook are not valid refs) and zero (non-Wikipedia) hits-http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22ping+pong+ball%22+camelot+re-rack. The purpose of Wikipedia is to document (previously established) notability, not create notability. Seattlenow 22:50, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete The game has no notability, even the article recognizes this fact. Calgary 23:11, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NOT#HOWTO; fails WP:N and WP:V. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?)} 23:16, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Nothing notable about this game. i ^said 20:55, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Surely we shouldn't use Wikipedia to publicise a non-notable game.--Bedivere 18:58, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.