Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cairnhill F.C.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 00:24, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cairnhill F.C.

NN, no Google hits. Although clearly false information (which raised my attention) has been removed from the article, its authenticity remains doubtful. Julius Sahara 15:28, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Sunday league team. Catchpole 16:14, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per others. Never Mystic (tc) 17:21, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Sunday league team, article makes no assertion of notability. Oldelpaso 20:29, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
• This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. Oldelpaso 20:29, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
• Were this in England, it would definitely fail existing guidelines for notability of football clubs. Therefore, even though this is North of the border, Delete, under Non-notability or verifiability, take your pick. - fchd 20:47, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - non-notable Sunday league club. Article creator appears to think article should stay because other amateur clubs have articles, however those are Saturday clubs with extensive histories playing in notable leagues, as opposed to a Sunday team who only started playing this season in a league which doesn't have its own article....ChrisTheDude 23:15, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
• Strong delete - Sunday league clubs are definitely non-notable. Qwghlm 14:05, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Per nom. HornetMike 22:10, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Sunday football; not notable -- MLD · T · C · @:  10:48, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• Random comment I don't believe this should affect the AfD debate in any way, but I was intrigued to see that this team apparently has someone playing for them who actually has his own article, namely Josey Rowan.... ChrisTheDude 14:08, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.