Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CCDF

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was BJAODN and REDIRECT to Cumulative distribution function. — JIP | Talk 13:10, 9 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] CCDF

Looks to be silly vanity/nonsense Whitejay²⁵¹ 14:11, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

• Restore It might be the speediest nonsense ever written but it's not possible to check that now. If an article goes on Afd rather than speedy, then I feel a few votes are needed prior to its being deleted. Dlyons493 Talk 16:23, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
• I speedied it as nonsense to save everyone time - but I've now restored it as requested. --Doc (?) 19:13, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy Yup - it's rubbish. Dlyons493 Talk 19:23, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Cumulative distribution function, since a CCDF is a complementary cumulative distribution function (a CCDF), although that target article needs to have such a mention added. (It need not be there for this to be a sensible redirect, however).-Splash^talk 19:41, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
  • I have now added a mention of the CCDF to cumulative distribution function. This will be a sensible redirect. -Splash^talk 19:48, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
• BJAODN, then redirect per Splash. Ilmari Karonen 23:11, 2 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.