Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buzz! Junior

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: boldly merged to Buzz! so there is a single article about the series as a whole (plus the individual articles about each game). Non-admin closure. ~Matticus TC 14:07, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Buzz! Junior

Buzz! Junior (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Reason: The Article is small and demonstrates no notability. Woggy 19:36, 18 July 2007 (UTC) cat=U Debate not yet sorted


This Article is a very small article, And includes little information and no notability. An idea would be to improve this article and expand it. (Woggy 07:24, 19 July 2007 (UTC))

  • This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 10:06, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy keep If you think an article only needs expansion, you should not take it to AfD - articles should be deleted if the subject is not viable, not because of poor/lack of content. As part of a successful series of games it is indeed notable. ~Matticus TC 10:27, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

I will remove the speedy seletion notice (For Now) but, If the article is not improved before 20th August 2007, I will renominate it for deletion again. I will remove the notice when you reply. (Woggy 12:58, 20 July 2007 (UTC))

  • Delete Look, I made a mistake, (I thought notable meant descriptive) I only joined 1 month ago. But this article, Which was created on May 27th is a small paragraph long, And i believe it should be improved. I have changed my mind, I will not remove the notice, Until it can be improved. This article has been like this for 1 Month, And nobodys Expanded it. But i think that this article is in need of some improvement. Because it is a paragraph long, I think it should be deleted. (Woggy 13:11, 20 July 2007 (UTC))
That doesn't make any sense. Nick mallory 13:35, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.