The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 10:08, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
Shallow spambait article existing only to hang an external link on --BozMotalk 10:40, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
Delete per nom, part of an organised pattern of linkspam activity. CiaranG 11:20, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
Delete per lack of reliable sources. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 17:18, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
delete per above. Pete.Hurd 16:32, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.