Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buster Cannon Forums

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy deleted by Alphachimp per CSD A7. BryanG^(talk) 00:01, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Buster Cannon Forums

Buster Cannon Forums (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Article about a webforum established in October 2006. No assertion of notability and doesn't have a chance of passing WP:WEB, especally with only 66 registered members. The article is mostly original research by the sites administrator (WP:COI) with no sources referenced. --Farix (Talk) 12:15, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

ATTENTION! If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on a forum, please note that this is not a majority vote, but rather a discussion to establish a consensus among Wikipedia editors on whether a page is suitable for this encyclopedia. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines to help us decide this, and deletion decisions are made on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes. Nonetheless, you are welcome to participate and express your opinions. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments by suspected single-purpose accounts can be tagged using {{subst:spa|username}}

• Delete - no sources except the link to the site itself; fails WP:WEB; no evidence of notability. As it only has 66 members and the article makes no other claims of notability, it might even be speedy delete per CSD A7. Walton monarchist89 12:17, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete - unremarkable web content. So tagged. MER-C 12:41, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.