Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bushi Ban

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 10:34Z

[edit] Bushi Ban

Bushi Ban (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)
Bushi ban (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (added by closing admin)

According to web site very small cluster of schools - Non-notable. No case made for notability - yet another martual art style created by somebody. Peter Rehse 00:16, 28 February 2007 (UTC)


  • Delete unless independent sources are produced. Currently no independent sources showing notability. --Shirahadasha 02:57, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Cram school (i.e. Buxiban). No notability as a martial arts style. Amusingly, the name seems to have been chosen independently of buxiban ... "The name BUSHI BAN derives from two different words, Bushi-Do [Japanese warrior spirit and martial arts] and Bando [ ancient Burmese system of martial discipline]. The name Bushi Ban has come to mean Way of Disciplined Warrior." [1] cab 03:17, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. I'm not in favour of redirecting to Cram school since the main theme of Bushi Ban, being martial arts, isn't prominently mentioned in the Cram school article and would send the Cram school article drifting. IntinnTalk! 10:38, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. dcandeto 16:30, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete WP:RS and WP:NN. Very short article and with respect, very little relevant information.Tellyaddict 16:36, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment I've come across these sites relating to the subject matter: [2], [3], [4] (mention), [5], [6], [7], [8]. I think an article could be created. Suriel1981 13:09, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
    • These are all advertisement pages.Peter Rehse 00:04, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.