Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burnies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Celestianpower ^háblame 16:32, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Burnies

Attempt to coin a neologism. NN OR (burnies "burning man" gets 25 hits on Google) --Anetode 03:50, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete Not notable.--Dakota 04:37, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. If we have an article on Burning Man Festival, maybe could mention that festival goers have different attitudes towards the festival. So...possibly merge. But this seems all unverified on non-encyclopedic.—Gaff ^ταλκ 04:40, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. There is quite an extensive article on Burning Man. This information, if valid, would be much more fitting within the Burning Man article, so merge if apropos. ♠DanMS 05:03, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable neologism. — JIP | Talk 08:57, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. If this information is in fact true, extensive research would still have to be done to verify it and make the text something worth merging anyway. And at that point, you might as well rewrite it from scratch. In any case, regardless of the state of the text, it's not a topic that deserves its own encyclopedic entry. --Jacquelyn Marie 15:39, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. If true, deserves at most one sentence in Burning Man. MCB 21:35, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete NN - agree with MCB --Rogerd 02:13, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.