Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bubb Rubb 2nd nomination
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Proto::► 09:50, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Bubb Rubb
Nomination for deletion Minor, short-lived internet funny video. Survived first afd in December 2005 with a strong keep consensus although half the discussion doesn't seem serious. 46,000 google hits but mostly web forums, blogs, user video sites. 0 hits on Amazon booksearch[1]. ~6 unique hits on Factiva news database with 2 hits in 2003 for brief CBS news stories where Bubb Rubb is mentioned as one of several examples of funny videos on the internet. Fails WP:WEB Bwithh 22:54, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep: Just because an older Internet meme isn't getting any new exposure doesn't mean it's no longer notable. I fail to see how this article fails WP:WEB when it most clearly passes criterion #1, since multiple works have significantly used samples of the original KRON broadcast (soundboard, remixes, etc.). If your problem is with the fact that it's an Internet meme, then I insist that you also try to delete other, more obscure memes and see what happens. ---Bersl2 01:14, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- User:Bersl2 wrote "since multiple works have significantly used samples of the original KRON broadcast (soundboard, remixes, etc.)". Are there any works at al l using the samples which are not amateur-produced works or have substantive mainstream media recognition?. As for more obscure memes, its a Herculean task (no comment on which one), but I'll putting on my regular review list going forward. Remember, WP:CCC. Bwithh 01:20, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- ...I'll just assume that cleaning the Augean stables is the particular task. -- Kicking222 01:40, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, WP:CCC, but I think your deletionist-exclusionist ideology is hardly on its way to consensus. ;) ---Bersl2 03:07, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- User:Bersl2 wrote "since multiple works have significantly used samples of the original KRON broadcast (soundboard, remixes, etc.)". Are there any works at al l using the samples which are not amateur-produced works or have substantive mainstream media recognition?. As for more obscure memes, its a Herculean task (no comment on which one), but I'll putting on my regular review list going forward. Remember, WP:CCC. Bwithh 01:20, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
-
- I urge all !voters to view the linked video of the original newscast in the article by the way. I'm not sure what the humour of the clip is supposed to be unless its the not very noble "those people talk kinda funny haw haw" strain. Bwithh 01:51, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination; no evidence of any non-trivial reporting, sunk without trace. As for Bersl2's "delete other memes", WP:INN refers. Angus McLellan (Talk) 12:17, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per everyone except Bersl2. --DeLarge 23:59, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as above. Carpet9 23:59, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
