Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bronzewood Lodge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I would be happy to userfy this. east.718 at 15:46, 11/5/2007

[edit] Bronzewood Lodge

Bronzewood Lodge (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Subject lacks real world notability, no secondary sources to meet WP:FICT, in universe context only Pilotbob 20:15, 30 October 2007 (UTC) Pilotbob 20:15, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

• Keep. The subject plays a role in Dungeon's best-selling adventure path. This propossal is Cruftcruft, and a result of Pilotbob wishing to disrupt Wikipedia to make a point.--Robbstrd 21:32, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

This is simply not true. I don't appreciate being accused of disrupting Wikipedia to make a point. Remember WP:AGF. I have made legitimate points regarding the deletion of this article. Additionally, playing a role in a D&D adventure path does not establish real world notability. There are no secondary sources per WP:FICT to establish notability. Pilotbob 22:05, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

• Comment I note that Robbstrd's has not declared his interest that he is the creator this article. Unfortunetly, he has chosen to make unjustified accusations to discredit the nominator of "his" article. I would suggest that he owes the nominator an appology for lack of civility, and his comments be struck from the record on the grounds that he is POV pushing. It would be more constructive if he could add reliable sources to the article, rather than blaming other editors for pointing out that it does not have any. --Gavin Collins 11:02, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

• Comment The article has had adequate sources from the outset. Pilotbob's real axe-grinding agenda seems to be a distaste for material that is not about the 'real world'. That's just I don't like it. Colonel Warden 11:47, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletions. --Gavin Collins 08:47, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete -- no notability in the Real World. If you dispute this, please provide quality-assessable sources -- 195.92.40.49 —Preceding comment was added at 12:52, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
• Merge and Redirect somewhere appropriate, like to Age of Worms, or a new article about locations in Greyhawk. Pinball22 13:11, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Inadequately referenced, in-universe style, fails WP:N and WP:FICT. Edison 13:32, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, no evidence of notability from secondary sources. Fails WP:FICT. Doctorfluffy 04:53, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete and userfy so that Robbstrd can add reliable sources to demonstrate the notability at his leisure. --Gavin Collins 11:02, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
• Merge and Redirect Pinball22's suggestion that there should be an omnibus article about locations in Greyhawk is good and constructive. Colonel Warden 11:42, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete or Merge into Dungeons & Dragons. - --Brewcrewer 17:19, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - fails WP:FICT.   jj137 (Talk) 22:44, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.