Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brent Allison

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Flowerparty☀ 02:44, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Brent Allison

Person whose only notability is founding a political party a few days ago. That article is also up for deletion. My vote is clearly for delete. Wickethewok 18:46, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete *Arrggh* per nom. PJM 19:01, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
• Merge into party article if kept. Else, Delete - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 19:54, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete There's no way either he or the brand new party and their few dozen buccaneers should be kept at this time. Fan1967 20:40, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete What is this, some guy's resume? SmartGuy 20:53, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
• Walk the plank as non-notarrrble, together with his "party", which is also going to the wiki-bottom. Sandstein 21:00, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Don't you actually need to be elected or something close to it in order to claim notability through politics? Falcon 23:05, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. A grad student who's floated an idea? That's it? --Calton | Talk 08:39, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Okay, I'm flattered that someone decided to make a Wikipedia entry about me, and it did get me lots of cool points with my friends. Still, if none of my higher-ranking colleagues in academia are getting Wiki entries, then it's probably a good sign that I don't merit one now. But if it will Merge into the party article if it's kept per CrazyRussian's suggestion, I won't object. The academic jargon they got from my site for the entry would just have to be consolidated/removed if that happened. -- Brent Allison, 15:12, 10 June 2006 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.211.187.253 (talk • contribs)
• Delete and Redirect to Pirate Party assuming the other article gets merged. Paul^C/_T+ 18:21, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Article's subject just requested deletion on the basis of admitted non-notability. But if Pirate Party is kept, redirects are cheap. —WAvegetarian•(talk) 07:37, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.