Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brain Leaf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 21:39, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Brain Leaf

Non-notable part of the Warhammer 40,000 universe; as a benchmark, this is less notable than the recently deleted Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deep strike. Contested prod: page author asserts that it should merged somewhere, but there really is nowhere sensible to merge it: it's nowhere near notable enough to be mentioned on the main Warhammer 40,000 page, and doesn't fit into Warhammer 40,000 species, which is for the playable armies in the game. Pak21 08:14, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Warhammer 40,000-related deletions. -- Pak21 08:19, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete very minor 40k reference that would struggle to gain a mention in the trivia section of a 40k article MLA 10:03, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
• I put the article in more as a Necromunda reference than a 40k one, as it was a part of the official Necromunda rules. 60.241.5.208 10:12, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: I see no mentions of the term "leaf" in the main Necromunda rule book. The only place I can instantly find it is in the Underhive Bestiary Part 3, which is tagged as "optional/house rules". --Pak21 11:00, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
    • It was in the original rules, in the Outlanders supplement. The material in that supplement is being gradually re-released on the website, which is why it's in the optional rules section. I don't mind if the article is deleted particularly, but I could also create a Creatures of Necromunda article and merge it there. I'm planning to expand the articles about Necromunda extensively when I get some time. Pacey 22:08, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, nn. --Terence Ong 14:29, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete irrelevant. Munckin 06:50, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as said above. Freddie (Talk) 01:38, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.