Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boogie Allen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 17:18, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Boogie Allen

Boogie Allen (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

(contested prod) College football player that hasn't received significant (if any) media coverage. Fails WP:BIO. brewcrewer (yada, yada) 18:27, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Keep He saved a game with a recovered onside kick (which did recieve media coverage), has two key interceptions, and will be the starting safety next season. The article will be recreated by me once the season begins anyways. John (talk) 20:51, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 19:29, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Doesn't seem sufficiently notable, unless I'm missing something. If his career picks up next season, that would be the time to have an article on him.--Michig (talk) 19:42, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Fails WP:BIO for amateur athletes. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:43, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Fails WP:BIO for college athletes if he becomes notable next year then he can have an article. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:00, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Next year if he gets coverage, and his career picks up. Happy New Year!! Malinaccier (talk) 21:00, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Non-notable guy. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 10:39, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Subject currently unsuited for encyclopedia entry. —Encephalon 18:58, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
• Keep he a very good college player. If you delete him you might as well delete every athlete from college sports on here. --Crash Underride 21:09, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Not notable, maybe someday he will be and that would be the time for him to have an article.OneHappyHusky (talk) 06:53, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.