Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Shaloob

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 02:53, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Bob Shaloob

Bob Shaloob (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Per Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Politicians. No Google hits other than this very article. Article says he has gained significant media attention for his plan to socialize the American Health Care System. Surely Google would return said "significant media attention" but unfortunately, Google does not. Plus, I live in Mississippi and have never heard of this guy. ALLSTAR ^echo 22:33, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Not even any Ghits on "Robert Shaloob", fails WP:N & WP:V. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 22:43, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - per nom and WP:BIO#Politicians (yes, that statement was redundant). To attempt to find any links to RS reporting of the subject, I located the website of Green Party of Mississippi, which contradicts multiple statements within this article (candidates for 2008 not yet selected, first Green Party candidate elected to office in Mississippi was in 2004, so others have been on ballot before, etc). Also, website of Mississippi Secretary of State does not show this name on any searches that I attempted. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 22:50, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Article fails to assert notability. This is a contested proposed deletion. Jehochman ^Talk 22:53, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - probable hoax, google hits are mirrors only. Addhoc (talk) 22:56, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable bio. MBisanz ^talk 23:03, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - unverifiable, and apparently incorrect. I suppose he might be running to be selected as a candidate by the Green party, but that would be even less notable than simply being chosen as a candidate. Iain99^{Balderdash and piffle} 23:08, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - fails WP:N and WP:V. --BelovedFreak 23:34, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
• Snowball Delete - obvious non-notablility or verifiability. SeanMD80^{talk | contribs} 23:40, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable politician. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 09:35, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Looks like a hoax given the evidence here. Montco (talk) 18:43, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.