Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blagman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:49, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blagman

Website of no demonstrated significance, delete --Peta 05:44, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per "Blagman.co.uk ... is a UK based site which aims to introduce readers to new products and services.". Advertising. (|-- UlTiMuS 09:25, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

• Comment Could we not argue the same for website pages such as those for IGN.com? Surely if people want information on a site it should be shown on Wikipedia? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Gamerswave (talk • contribs) .
• Delete — no assertation of notability. For an article to stay on wikipedia, the notability of the subject must be asserted plainly in the article and must be backed up with verifiable sources. Martinp23 11:57, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as per nom -- Whpq 20:12, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Ultimus took the words out of my mouth. Or fingers. Baseball,Baby! ^{balls•strikes} 20:43, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, no Alexa ranking, reads like an advertisment, no assertion of notability, hasn't been featured in media enough times to make it notable by itself. The user's only contributions are based in that article and in adding external links to articles pointing to that webpage. Sorry, first become notable, then create the article at Wikipedia. -- ReyBrujo 20:50, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.