Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bischeme

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete.  (aeropagitica)  18:34, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Bischeme

A well thought out, but utterly OR-based article. Wikipedia is not the place for this; hopefully it will find a nice home elsewhere. --PeruvianLlama^(spit) 20:23, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

• delete does appear to violate WP:NOR. if its not original research, then its certainly nn. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 21:04, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as surely OR and nn. Joe 22:40, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, nn. ¡Dustimagic! ^(T/C) 05:12, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 05:55, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.