Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bird Flu Planning

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Deleted by User:Jimfbleak. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-02-27 05:21Z

[edit] Bird Flu Planning

Bird Flu Planning (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

At first glance this reads like a potentially OK article, albeit in need of improvement. However, it appears to be in fact spam, being an advert for the Bird Flu Planning website linked at the foot of the article. The username of the author would suggest they have a vested interest too. Jules1975 16:40, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Current topic of interest but its carefully concealed as an advertisement.--PrincessBrat 16:51, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete A concealed advert is worse than a blatant one. --Daniel J. Leivick 17:09, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Copyvio from http://www.continuitybusinesssolutions.com/proactive-manager.htm RJFJR 17:23, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete. Copy vio and spam. Adambro 20:30, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete copyvio. So tagged. BryanG^(talk) 23:23, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.