Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biomedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Ian Manka Talk to me! 21:01, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Biomedia

Neologism - googling shows no fixed meaning Artw 19:31, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Seems to be coined in a real book but has not taken off. Non-notable neologism.--Nick Y. 20:54, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete article admits it's a "buzzword", and given the definition it can't really be used as anything else. Opabinia regalis 03:20, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.