Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Binick

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. —Cleared as filed. 02:49, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Binick

Non-notable, and appears to simply be an expression by a non-notable person. Searching Google for "Binick" reveals a number of pages referring to people with the last name of Binick, but no uses in this context. SchuminWeb (Talk) 23:38, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as neologism. I have the same conclusion as the nom after looking at google results, plus it's hard to take it seriously with bits like "its meaning has been interwoven in the fabric of our society for thousands of years..." ×Meegs 04:27, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable, unverifiable neologism, i.e. protologism. Stifle 09:13, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, neologism, and a waste of time... --Brian1979 22:33, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per all of above. James084 20:53, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.