Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Billmon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep per WP:SNOW, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 18:48, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Billmon

Billmon (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

Bio article should be deleteed. Subject's blog has been deactivated for over six months. Subject no longer meets (and may never have met) the Wikipedia criteria for personal notability. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Peter Principle (talk • contribs) 2007/07/18 03:14:48 — Peter Principle (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

  • This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 10:06, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy strong keep Billmon was one of the absolutely most notable profile of the blogosphere, in the same class as Steve Gilliard, Matthew Yglesias, and Kevin Drum among others.--Victor falk 11:09, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep as notable. Just because the reason a person is notable is no longer current is not a reason for deletion. Should Don Imus's article be deleted because he's no longer on the air? I note that this AfD is the only edit of the nom. —Travistalk 14:47, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Can easily pass WP:N and WP:V. Not a fair nomination. Adrian M. H. 16:40, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, primary topic of articles in WIRED and Philly Inquirer, passes WP:BIO. Notability is permanent. --Dhartung | Talk 17:53, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy keep due to defective nomination, which calls for deletion based on non-currency of notability. Wikipedia says notability is permanent, and there is no basis for nominating an article because the subject is no longer active in his area of notability. WP:Nis satisfied by the award he won as a left of center blogger, by widespread discussion on the web, and by two press articles in the Philadelphia Inquirer. I will add 2 sources to the article which have substantial coverage and satisfy WP:N and WP:A, namely "'Blinq | At Whiskey Bar, was it last call?' Daniel Rubin. The Philadelphia Inquirer. Knight Ridder Tribune Business News (wire service). Washington: Jan 3, 2007. pg. 1 which said "Russ Wellen, writing in OpEdNews, called Billmon 'the man who may have done more to bring respectability to blogging than anybody.' " and "'Blinq | As blogger burns out, his fame fades, too.' Daniel Rubin. The Philadelphia Inquirer. Knight Ridder Tribune Business News (wire service). Washington: Apr 15, 2006. pg. 1" which said "Two springs ago, Billmon won a Koufax Award when the place he calls Whiskey Bar was voted the best-written lefty blog in America." and "his name carried weight in blog and political circles." I found both at Proquest. The OpEdNews is a blog with signed contributions and editorial supervision with selection of what is printed [1] and appears to satisfy WP:N. There the article referred to in the Inquirer is at [2] and could alos be added to the article. Edison 18:13, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.