Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Deal (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Nishkid64 01:30, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Big Deal

Big Deal (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This appears to be a non-notable person; in addition, I cannot find any information about him on Google. Anthony Rupert 05:21, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per nom, and consider bundling Nick Treble in there as well for precisely the same reasons (although Mr Treble has two external links, they're both his own). The fact that he hasn't got a record deal - regardless of capitals - clinches it for me. Note further, although it's relatively clear even without language abilities, that the German Wikipedia article being linked to is about an unrelated band. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 05:59, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --MPerel ^{( talk | contrib)} 09:22, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. I think the fact that the only external link is to a myspace account, it has no notability. And as the nominater stated, Google doesn't offer any real information on him. A one time edit, too, so chances are no one knows who the guy is. → JARED ^(t)  18:34, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete and reconsider when a record deal or similar is struck. Stephen B Streater 20:07, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, no assertion of notability, possibly speedy as A7. I previously deleted this article as an A7. --Coredesat 21:32, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.