Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Buildings

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Flowerparty☀ 03:17, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Big Buildings

Looks like a hoax. Moreover, Google doesnt return relevant links, the only external link given links to a singular picture. Nearly Headless Nick 16:23, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

No, the page linked to is the website for the artist (not a singular page), and the website is among the first to appear in Google. --Mrsteakneggs 16:28, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

There are over ten links to other pages on Wiki here that are directly related to the entry. So are these pages also not notable? --Mrsteakneggs 16:37, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep; if the biography section is true then it's just barely notable per WP:MUSIC. However, the article desperately needs verification to prove that it isn't a hoax and to back up all the "acclaim" statements. Melchoir 18:38, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, it fails WP:MUSIC. "Continues to tour in the United States" is not a national tour... the rest is PR fluff. But at least allmusic lists them. Even if this is kept it needs a) reliable sources 2) bias work. - Motor (talk) 11:29, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete The band is on a completely non-notable label and doesn't seem to pass WP:MUSIC, while the article is completely unverified and somewhat POV. -- Kicking222 22:47, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Not notable --Starionwolf 23:02, 11 June 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.