Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Best Believe It

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 23:29, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Best Believe It

Best Believe It (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable album, no valid references, no coverage in third party sources. Polly (Parrot) 20:11, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

  • Speedy delete G3 as hoax, so tagged. A search for the artist + title turns up nothing outside of Wikipedia; the album cover looks like a horrid MSPaint job; and MCA didn't exist in 2004 (it was merged into Decca in '03, save for the Nashville division, which I doubt would have released a heavy metal album). Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 20:41, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete - I don't feel that it's a matter of WP:HOAX, but complete lack of verifiability and notability. If this is the case, then it fails WP:MUSIC album. [1] and [2] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wisdom89 (talk • contribs)
  • Delete as a WP:HOAX. I can confirm TenPoundHammer's finding of a lack of Google hits for artist (the only two google hits are to Wikipedia). The major label that the creator of the article proclaims the record was released on stopped releasing music under that name in 2003. Doc StrangeMailbox Orbitting Black HoleStrange Frequencies 21:54, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Wisdom89 (T / C) 22:01, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Wisdom89 (T / C) 22:01, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete as a hoax. If the article is correct if would be easy to find sources, also the reference provided is not relevant to the article. --Snigbrook (talk) 00:38, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete looks to be completely fake. Nuke it. --BrucePodger (talk) 00:46, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete, though someone has a wicked sense of humour. sparkl!sm hey! 20:07, 25 March 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.