Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernice Golberg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Will (message me!) 08:38, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Bernice Golberg

Non notable candidate fails WP:BIO doktorb _words^deeds 11:17, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

• Weak keep May have some notability as an academic--Her 1998 paper in the Journal of Advanced Nursing has 13 citations in the ISI web of science database (which is a fair, though not huge, number). Expansion to include information about academics would be appropriate. --TeaDrinker 03:51, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

For what it's worth, 13 citations as an academic is not particularly noteworthy, per WP:PRPF WilyD 17:21, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Deathphoenix ʕ 17:05, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete a suburban politician? 202 google hits? I say delete AdamBiswanger1 17:08, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Can we at least get the results of the elections mentioned? I suspect they would cement the non-notability. --cholmes75 ^{(chit chat)} 20:37, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.