Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benjamin Birkbeck

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)  10:30, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Benjamin Birkbeck

I cleaned this up but further investigation reveals that it's probably not an article worth having. Fewer than 80 GHits, mostly irrelevant. I've not been able to verify the assertion to notability either. Soo 17:35, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom, although I'll change my view if secondary references are included. Addhoc 17:51, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. 21 unique Ghits, the relevant ones are mainly for blogsites and myspace. I'm afraid Emmy nominations don't count towards fulfilling WP:MUS. This is a vanity article written by User:Dunneroman, which happens to be the name of his own record label (Website link here). Fails WP:AUTO and WP:VAIN. Ohconfucius 03:10, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.