The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was speedy keep - no basis to delete. ➨ЯЄDVERS 18:58, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Just a character from a crappy kid show that nobody cares about Newspaper99 17:53, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Speedy keep per baseless, bad faith nomination. (User's edits are all listing articles for deletion using this rationale). -Goldom‽‽‽⁂ 17:58, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Speedy keep. All Pokemon have articles, so no need to get rid of just one. Hurricanehink (talk) 18:36, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.