Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Being magazine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. JERRY ^talk _contribs 04:05, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Being magazine

Being magazine (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Not notable; tagged for notability since November 2007. Lea (talk) 11:58, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

• Weak delete unless third-party sources are found, I can't find any.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 07:36, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
• delete I can't find any reliable sources. The obvious google searches don't turn anything useful up. JoshuaZ (talk) 19:22, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.