Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beaten by Them

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Philippe 23:52, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Beaten by Them

Beaten by Them (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable band. Article is written by a usercalled "logicpole", which just so happens to be the name of their production company (Do google) so "conflict of interest" comes in as well. CyberGhostface (talk) 21:52, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete and why can't autobiographers avoid writing blatant ads? Vanity doesn't have to sound vain. Potatoswatter (talk) 22:19, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

And they make it so obvious too. Whenever I look through the CoI list I always go for the ones where the username is the same as the article name first.--CyberGhostface (talk) 22:44, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete Fails WP:N and also vanispamcruftisement. Edison (talk) 23:51, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete does not meet any of the WP:BAND notability criteria, I cannot find any reliable news sources reporting about them, they haven't won any awards as far as i know, and their band label doesn't appear to be notable either.  Atyndall93 | talk  08:52, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete for all of the excellent reasons given above. Qworty (talk) 09:48, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.