Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battlestar Wiki (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 08:01, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Battlestar Wiki

Unsourced article on a Microwiki (1100 pages). Seemingly ample blog links, but zero news hits either on Google News or NewsBank. Was recreated after a first AfD, with consensus Delete. Prodded, seconded and deprodded as potentially controversial. ~ trialsanderrors 19:02, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

• If this has been posted after a consensus to delete, then it should qualify for speedy deletion. Indrian 19:03, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Not if it's different content. The recreate came a year after the AfD. ~ trialsanderrors 19:05, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - No notability asserted --Peephole 20:46, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Delete because it doesn't seem very notable. I know they have lots of blog links though, like the nominator says. But it still doesn't seem quite notable enough. Sorry. Allisonmontgomery69 22:35, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. No WP:WEB, RS, V, etc. rootology 20:01, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom; if CSD A7 applied to websites (and why shouldn't it be applied to wikis ?) this would be speedyable for failure to imply notability. Angus McLellan (Talk) 22:52, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. I can't see any reason why to include this in Wikipedia as of this writing. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. ^{Think out loud — WP:PORN BIO?} 02:36, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete no secondary sources at all. No news articles. Hardvice 08:54, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Cant see why this would be kept Jimbo68 16:37, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.