The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Ian MankaTalk to me! 01:36, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
The book is insufficiently important to warrant a wikipedia page; Google Scholar only shows it being cited once, and the actual wikipedia page provides no reason to keep it. - Frekja 18:19, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Delete. Non-noteworthy, non-article. It's obviously such a clear deletion candidate that no one else has bothered to register a vote. :) Kickaha Ota 17:08, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.