Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barclay Family Tree

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete (4 delete, 1 transwiki, 2 comments). Mindmatrix 23:53, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Barclay Family Tree

Nice, but non-notable Ian Pitchford 11:00, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

• Non-notable. The origins of the name is marginally useful, but most of it is the originator's family tree Malcolm Farmer 11:02, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
  • The etymology of the name belongs in Barclay. Uncle G 19:30, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - this particular tree is non-notable. --Whouk (talk) 11:31, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete. Doesn't this qualify as a db-bio? Zunaid 11:49, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
• Wikipedia is not a genealogy database. It is an encyclopaedia. Get thee to WikiTree! Delete. Uncle G 19:30, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
• Transwiki to Wikitree. Stifle 22:28, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.