Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Balls ball
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete, per all reasons below --Steve (Stephen) talk 03:48, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Balls ball
It's a totally unsourced article about a game where you throw a lacrosse ball at another boy's genitals. If you check this diff, you can see it was made up at school, and Wikipedia is not for things made up one day at school. Was previously prod'd, but the tag was removed without comment. Not notable, and something Wikipedia is not. Haemo 21:58, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
- Strong delete. Strong violation of WP:NFT as per Haemo's findings. Certainly not notable. As an aside, I really don't like it because it's dangerous and possibly going to prevent the participants from having children...well, wait - if somebody is playing this, should they really be having children? =^_^=;; --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 22:08, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NFT. Merge with Darwin Awards per Dennis? ;) DarkAudit 22:12, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, Wikipedia is not for things you made up in school one day. -- Mithent 00:13, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete and if I don't hear any objection I'm probably going to speedy it. Newyorkbrad 00:16, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
- No objection, but on what rationale? --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 02:29, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
- One or more of blatant nonsense, non-notable, and/or WP:SNOW? Newyorkbrad 03:14, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
- And on the grounds that it was an expired prod when it was vandalised, and the revert removed the prod notice. How many more reasons do you need? ;) --Steve (Stephen) talk 03:41, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
- One or more of blatant nonsense, non-notable, and/or WP:SNOW? Newyorkbrad 03:14, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
- No objection, but on what rationale? --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 02:29, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
