Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Autoclaustrophobia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 18:00, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Autoclaustrophobia

PRODded with the reason "nonnotable neologism", speedy deleted with the reason "wikipedia is not for things made up on urbandictionary, i.e. neologism, i.e. snowball clause". The PROD was contested and the article does not meet any speedy criteria - however, all the reasons for doing so still apply. The sole source for the term is urbandictionary, which is, er, not quite a respected psychological source, and consequently the article fails WP:V and WP:NOR. Delete. Sam Blanning^(talk) 13:53, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete utter madeup claptrap with no sources -- Whpq 14:01, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Delete. Wikipedia is not neologism guide. Travislangley 21:21, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Anyone can edit urbandictionary. -Royalguard11^Talk 23:22, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:BALLS. Stifle (talk) 22:29, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.