Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aukerman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy Delete by User:IceKarma - CrazyRussian talk/email 15:43, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Aukerman

The history of the Aukerman name is not notable, nor is there any possibility it will become notable. Should someone named Aukerman be(come) famous, a page devoted to that person should be created instead. Frekja 21:51, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. This is appropriate for a blog, MySpace or a site devoted to genealogy. NOt for Wikipedia due to lack of notability. Interlingua ^talk 21:42, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, W.marsh 01:58, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, not notable. --Coredesat 02:19, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable. And I'm sorry I don't have anything to add to that, but really, this article is short enough to go unnoticed. ^Triana_C 02:23, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
• Comment. Created by User:Auk, which pretty much screams "vanity." But still, it would make me sad to delete this page. It's so earnest and warm. My head tells me to vote delete, but my heart tells me to take this one article and with it begin a GeneologyWiki which will be filled with people's family origins and stories. So I guess I just won't vote one way or the other. --Alex S 06:02, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete suspected vanity, but more importantly no assertion of notability. No-one has speedied it yet so I will. Paddles ^T_C 09:31, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete per above. I'm sure they're all nice people, just nn at the moment. Tychocat 10:12, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Looks like this article's been deleted. This discussion can be closed. --Coredesat 11:18, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.